Previous Message: seeking spelljammer pbem
Next Message: Re: Stoneskin and firearms
Month Index: December, 1998
From: "Downer, Chris" <Chris.Downer@?????????.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 13:30:54 -0600 Subject: Re: Stoneskin
> > I can see that side, too. But since we're dealing with kinetic energy > > now, isn't that like a .357 Magnum bullet bouncing off a steel > > breastplate? That rock has a lot of kinetic energy to stop. > > Yeah, but were talkin magic here. If I were to accept your reasonin, > that would mean that you could hit creatures that can only be hit by > magical weapons if you just hit em hard enough. And while were on the > subject: would you ppl say that usin a smokepowder firearm you can hit a > creature immune to nonmagical weapons? And if so, accordin to what > reasonin? Because smokepowder is magical? The issue hasn't occured IMC > yet, but it seems to me that it's pretty likely to pop up. So I'd > appreciate everyone's thoughts on the matter. > I use this reasoning in my game. this is how it breaks down, Creatures need to be hit by: Magical no Pluses - every 25hp dam in one combat round = 1hp dam. +1 - 50hp dam = 1hp dam. +2 - 75hp = 1hp +3 - 100hp = 1hp +4 - 125hp = 1hp +5 - 150hp = 1hp I also have other immunities in my game.
Previous Message: seeking spelljammer pbem
Next Message: Re: Stoneskin and firearms
Month Index: December, 1998
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoneskin | Patrick Stutzman | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | Patrick Stutzman | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | S. Wilson | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | Ryan Hamilton | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | the Falcon | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | the Falcon | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | the Falcon | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | IanQuentin@???.com | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | fuquajoseph@?????.????.edu | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | Abbadon the Dark Angel of Morning | |||
| Re: Stoneskin | Downer, Chris |