Previous Message: Re: Mecha in Spelljammer (was: Transformers)
Next Message: Re: OT?
Month Index: December, 1998
From: Thatotherguy <spellj@??????????.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 03:22:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: magic firearms
> >> > Kinda wasteful for a little bitty iron ball that would only get used > >> > once, barring the act of going & digging it out again. > >> > >> My point exactly. :) > >> > > Well they enchant arrows and they can get lost or broken. There is > > no difference. > > > > Yes but the arrows are usually recoverable. So cusomers will be > willing to pay for them. I don't know about 2nd Edition but in first edition all magic arrows that hit are destroyed, forever. 50% of those that miss are destroyed. > On the other hand bullets have to be "remade" to > be re-used and this probably will destroy the enchantment anyway (Unless > its like the JFK assassination "magic bullet" and does not deform at > impact. And if it is like this damage should be reduced while improving > accuracy since the lead shot causes more damage but is less accurate as it > deforms. This is why some ammo is Jacketed to control the deformation rate.) Seems like an adamantite or mithril bullet would do very well, especially with an added magical bonus. Then just dig it out of your foe's skull when the battle's done. _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @?????.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Previous Message: Re: Mecha in Spelljammer (was: Transformers)
Next Message: Re: OT?
Month Index: December, 1998
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: magic firearms | Grey Knowles | |||
| Re: magic firearms | Staffan Johansson | |||
| Re: magic firearms | Optimus | |||
| Re: magic firearms | Grey Knowles | |||
| Re: magic firearms | Thatotherguy |