Previous Message: Re: Re : Armor Rating and Manueverability Class
Next Message: Re: Re : Armor Rating and Manueverability Class
Month Index: November, 1998
From: The Fallen Angel <fallenangel422@?????.com> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 15:50:41 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: SpellJammer Accelerator thoughts, and AD&D firearms
---Solauren <solauren@?????.com> wrote: > > Hi > > My thoughts on smaller accelerators > Basically a arquebues that doesn't need smoke powder and won't back fire. > Cost: 1/10 - 1/5 of a full sized accelerator > does not do culmative damage on a roll of a 10 on the 1d10. > Treat as a piercing and a blunt weapon. Piercing for criticals. > > I have the stats on the other AD&D firearms if you want them. > > Oh, do you have a copy of the 2nd SpellJammer Appendix? I'd really like to > get a copy of it from you if it is possible. I'd even be willing to do some > kind of trade. > > > Please sendme the guns stats, and i take it you mean the MC appendix, no, I wish I had that myself. == Will "Fallen Angel" Wagner a.k.a. HawkAngel fallenangel422@?????.com <b><i>I don't suffer from insanity--I enjoy every minute of it.</i></b> _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @?????.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Previous Message: Re: Re : Armor Rating and Manueverability Class
Next Message: Re: Re : Armor Rating and Manueverability Class
Month Index: November, 1998