Previous Message: Re: attack craft
Next Message: Re: Mind Flayer Player Characters
Month Index: June, 1998
From: Harry Bandoian <scratch00@?????????.net> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 23:36:22 -0400 Subject: Re: attack craft
> Ack, I thought this thread died. Oh well. > Anyways, not bad angle on things. However, I think it's a matter of >taste. Personally, I don't use fighters for purely logistic reasons. >Basically, keeping track of a half dozen or so ships in battle is tough >enough as is, and having vast squads of fighters would only complicate >things. If a 'carrier' classed vessile were part of a battle, yes it >would have fighters but not many. For example, the Armada would have a >mere 10-12 fighters at most (then again, that's all that can reasonably >fit on it; I know, I drew deck plans;). Most "carriers" have less than >half. And for simplistics sake, fighters always travel in easy to use >squads. Yes but how about you take the fighters as 1 big ship with the tonnage pooled but they take attacks as diffrent ships. Besides most of the time fighters stay in formation except for the thimes when they have strikes to carry out. Besides I juz thought of introducing the idea of a torpedo type weapon and I needed a platform to carry it on! "Mess with the best. Die like the rest!!!"
Previous Message: Re: attack craft
Next Message: Re: Mind Flayer Player Characters
Month Index: June, 1998
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| attack craft | Harry Bandoian | |||
| Re: attack craft | Adam Miller | |||
| Re: attack craft | Harry Bandoian | |||
| Re: attack craft | Mutami@???.com | |||
| Re: attack craft | Harry Bandoian | |||
| Re: attack craft | Peter Mikelsons | |||
| Re: attack craft | Mutami@???.com | |||
| Re: attack craft | Kramer, Piet Rene | |||
| Re: attack craft | seeker@???.edu | |||
| Re: attack craft | A Half-Drow Bard... |