Re: Lugribossk

> >Any other observations?
>
> Well, the detail that irked me the most about it was that they assumed
> everyone would use the crappy psionics system from S&P - and the
> non-bug-fixed version too (where attacking hurts the attacker more
> than
> the defender). I think they should have provided CPHB stats for the
> new
> psionics, too.
>
	I too hate the S&P's psionics as well but you can convert it
back to CPHB which INAO (In my arrogant opinion) are the best Psionic
rules AD&D have come up with.