Previous Message: Re: Terminal velocity and orbits. (was: Spelljammer on planar walkabout)
Next Message: Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout
Month Index: April, 1998
From: Abe Brown <abebrown@?????????.????????.org> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1998 20:52:12 +0100 Subject: Re: Terminal velocity and orbits. (was: Spelljammer on planar walkabout)
>[nods] Gotcha. > [sighs] Finaly :) [snip] >>Both your physics and math are right as, it is your description of a >>forced orbit that is wrong. This because you need to apply thrust >>along the orbit as well as towards the planet in order to increase the >>centripetal force that is keeping you from smashing into the planet. > >But you don't _want_ to affect centrifugal "force." You want to get closer >to the planet by applying a constant force, so that if the force drops off >(you lose power, run out of fuel, etc.) you'll return to your previous >orbit. If you thrust along the orbit, you'll just affect the >unpowered-orbit distance, which is not what you want to do. This is a >convention used fairly regularly in hard SF (well, okay) and I think it may >have been used in real life as well--in any case, if my math _is_ correct, >it would be impossible to achieve a stable orbit, because of positive >feedback. Too close, and gravity increases faster than centrifugal force >and you fall even further in. Too far out, and gravity falls off and you >spin out into space. I _know_ my conclusions are wrong. I just can't figure >out where the error is. > Your error is that you do not take into account the fact that when the situation changes the rules governing it also change. For 'forced' orbits you need to be moving faster than is allowed in your target orbit so if the force that 'forces' you into that orbit (in this case your ships engines) ceases you will be 'thrown' back into a higher orbit (probably but not necessarily the one you started in). You are right that stable orbits are effectively impossible but it is possible to achieve an orbit that will only decay extremely slowly (i.e. less than 1 millimetre per century). Also you do not take into account the following the equation that you are using to work out centripetal force only applies when the object is moving in a circle (or a good approximation thereof) and that an object if it is moving out from its orbit it will lose energy due to gravity and if it moves inwards for its orbit it will gain energy due to gravity.
Previous Message: Re: Terminal velocity and orbits. (was: Spelljammer on planar walkabout)
Next Message: Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout
Month Index: April, 1998
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal velocity and orbits. (was: Spelljammer on planar walkabout) | Abe Brown | |||
| Re: Terminal velocity and orbits. (was: Spelljammer on planar walkabout) | Wilson, M.D. | |||
| Re: Terminal velocity and orbits. (was: Spelljammer on planar walkabout) | Abe Brown |