Previous Message: Re: Chronomancers in the Flow
Next Message: Random tables?
Month Index: April, 1998
From: "Wilson, M.D." <Hemlock@????.net> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 18:42:07 Subject: Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout
>No if what you are saying were true skydivers would have to wear >heat-shields because they often free-fall for several miles and a >human in free-fall reaches terminal velocity after only a few hundred >feet. I'm afraid I must admit ignorance on the matter of skydiving. I have absolutely no idea when a skydiver reaches terminal velocity or whether he heats up significantly. Since you favor the view that heat is _not_ generated--or at least not transferred to the skydiver--what do you propose happens to the heat energy from friction? >Also a Spelljammer would almost certainly (I can not say for certain >because I do not have data for surface area and mass) have a terminal >velocity well below the speed of sound and therefor would not generate >excessive heat through friction. I'm not certain what you mean. High air resistance would certainly mean that you reach terminal velocity sooner, as you say, thus decreasing kinetic energy. That just means, though, that you start using significant amounts of heat energy sooner rather than later. Every kilogram dropping a meter in Earth gravity generates one joule of energy, no matter _how_ fast it's going, whether it's accelerating, or whether it's at terminal velocity already. (This is, of course, because of the way energy is defined.) While we're sort of on the subject, I need someone to check my logic on a physics dilemma. Centripedal force is equal to [m*v^2/R], right? Thus, it varies inversely with distance. Gravity varies as the inverse square of distance, [G*m1*m2/d^2]. Double the distance, and centripedal force halves, while the force of gravity quarters itself. Thus, an orbit would be a delicate balance--get too far out, and you'll sail away into infinity. Too close, and gravity overpowers centrifugal "force" and you crash into the planet. Now, I know this can't be right, because it would make forced orbits impossible. (That's where you get into orbit, then thrust toward the orbited mass. It's very safe, because if you lose power you "fall" back to the original orbit.) Thus, either my math or my physics must be wrong. [scratches head] What am I doing wrong? Can anyone help? Hemlock
Previous Message: Re: Chronomancers in the Flow
Next Message: Random tables?
Month Index: April, 1998
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Manuel Gonzalez | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | gantr@???.edu | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Manuel Gonzalez | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Abe Brown | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Abe Brown | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | gantr@???.edu | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | gantr@???.edu | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Wilson, M.D. | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Wilson, M.D. | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Abe Brown | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Abe Brown | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Abe Brown | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | gantr@???.edu | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | gantr@???.edu | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Wilson, M.D. | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Wilson, M.D. | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Robert Underwood | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | gantr@???.edu | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Staffan Johansson | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Mutami | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Kelly St.Clair | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Manuel Gonzalez | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | A Half-Drow Bard... | |||
| Re: Spelljammer on planar walkabout | Static |