Previous Message: Re: Moral Genocide? (Was: IEN Fascists?)
Next Message: Re: New magic item
Month Index: February, 1998
From: Abe Brown <abebrown@?????????.????????.org> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 12:51:25 -0000 Subject: Re: New magic item
Sorry about not responding sooner but I have been busy with collage. -----Original Message----- From: Static <eshum@??????.???.com> To: spelljammer@????.com <spelljammer@????.com> Date: 02 February 1998 21:21 Subject: Re: [SPELLJAMMER] - New magic item >Greetings, > >In our last episode, Abe Brown said: >> >>All the recent discussion on the list about long range spells and >>devices has given me an idea for a new magic item. >> >>Spellcannon / Magecannon / Magegun > > How about Mana Amplifier? Not quite what I am looking for but good none the less > >>Appearance. >>This device is a six foot long rod of crystal mounted so that it can >>be moved to face any direction. It glows softly with an innerlight in >>the presence of a active spell jamming helm. > > A lense shape would be cool too. Maybe even a pedestal of some >sort, allowing the mage to "tap" the ship's power. I like the lens shape idea but I still prefer my design. > >>Mechanics. >>The device is able to increase the rang of any spell cast through it >>to 4 Hexes but it costs the ship SR dependant on the level of the >>spell cast through it. > > This is a very good way of handling it. Maybe you could even have >several versions of these things, each with different ranges. > >>I have two ideas for how to calculate the SR cost. >> >>Idea 1 >>The ship loses 1 point of SR for a number of rounds equal to the spell >>level. >> >>Idea 2 >>The ship loses 1 point of SR per spell level, with the loss >>diminishing by 1 point per round. > > I like method 1. Method 2 makes them almost "one-shots". Ok I will go with method 1. > >>Naturally the losses from either method of calculation would be >>cumulative. >> >>The device has a THAC0 of 15? >> >>XP value 4,500? >>GP value 45,000? >> >>(the XP and GP values are more likely to be adjusted down than up as I >>feel that this item is less powerful than an accelerator) > > I'd say they're *more* powerful than an accelerator. An accelerator >can only do d2 per round to the ship. A Magecannon can Cloudkill most >of the crew, or put 'em to sleep. I agreee whit you that they are more power full than an accelerator (I was half alsleep when I sent the orriginal message) see my second post on the item. > > Hope that helps... :) > It does.
Previous Message: Re: Moral Genocide? (Was: IEN Fascists?)
Next Message: Re: New magic item
Month Index: February, 1998
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New magic item | Abe Brown | |||
| Re: New magic item | Static | |||
| Re: New magic item | Abe Brown | |||
| Re: New magic item | John McCloud | |||
| Re: New magic item | Mutami@???.com | |||
| Re: New magic item | Abe Brown | |||
| Re: New magic item | Abe Brown |