Previous Message: Re: Elven Superiority? Yeah, right.
Next Message: Re: wight star?
Month Index: October, 1997
From: "E. John Wilson" <jw_gk@???????.ca> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 16:40:59 -0400 Subject: Re: SR Rating
Static wrote:
> In our last episode, Brett Lang said:
> > Not quite accurate. There are two other ways I know to go
> beyond the
> >standard SR speed ceiling.
> > The first: the Thayvian quad ship can attain twice normal
> spelljamming
> >velocites, but is still restricted to a maximum tactical SR of 10.
> > Also, Netherese spelljammers were / are ? capable of
> sustaining SR's of 20
> >and double spelljamming speed's.
>
> Where did all this "maximum tactical SR of 10" stuff come
> from?
> I thought that SR was determeined by the spelljamming mage and the
> helm.
>
> -Static
IMC I have made a limit of SR 10 unless you purchase a specially
modified
Helm (read $$$$$) from the arcane.
I made this rule to limit Ramming damage and I allow the Defender to
save Vs
crusshing blow (piercing attack for the piercing ram) to take half
damage.
OverLord
Previous Message: Re: Elven Superiority? Yeah, right.
Next Message: Re: wight star?
Month Index: October, 1997
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: SR Rating | Brett Lang | |||
| Re: SR Rating | Static | |||
| Re: SR Rating | Mutami@???.com | |||
| Re: SR Rating | E. John Wilson | |||
| Re: SR Rating | Eric Sheff | |||
| Re: SR Rating | E. John Wilson | |||
| Re: SR Rating | Jeremy G. | |||
| Re: SR Rating | Mutami@???.com | |||
| Re: SR Rating | Max Wilson | |||
| Re: SR Rating | Max Wilson | |||
| Re: SR Rating | Mutami@???.com |