Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Elven Superiority? Yeah, right.
Next Message: Re: wight star?
Month Index: October, 1997


From:     "E. John Wilson" <jw_gk@???????.ca>
Date:     Mon, 06 Oct 1997 16:40:59 -0400
Subject:  Re: SR Rating
Static wrote:

> In our last episode, Brett Lang said:
> >       Not quite accurate.  There are two other ways I know to go
> beyond the
> >standard SR speed ceiling.
> >       The first:  the Thayvian quad ship can attain twice normal
> spelljamming
> >velocites, but is still restricted to a maximum tactical SR of 10.
> >       Also, Netherese spelljammers were / are ? capable of
> sustaining SR's of 20
> >and double spelljamming speed's.
>
>         Where did all this "maximum tactical SR of 10" stuff come
> from?
> I thought that SR was determeined by the spelljamming mage and the
> helm.
>
> -Static

IMC I have made a limit of SR 10 unless you purchase a specially
modified
Helm (read $$$$$) from the arcane.
    I made this rule to limit Ramming damage and I allow the Defender to
save Vs
crusshing blow (piercing attack for the piercing ram) to take half
damage.


OverLord


Previous Message: Re: Elven Superiority? Yeah, right.
Next Message: Re: wight star?
Month Index: October, 1997

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re: SR Rating    Brett Lang    06 Oct 1997 00:14:41
Re: SR Rating    Static    06 Oct 1997 15:27:29
Re: SR Rating    Mutami@???.com    06 Oct 1997 19:14:17
Re: SR Rating    E. John Wilson    06 Oct 1997 20:40:59
Re: SR Rating    Eric Sheff    06 Oct 1997 21:14:21
Re: SR Rating    E. John Wilson    06 Oct 1997 21:52:47
Re: SR Rating    Jeremy G.    07 Oct 1997 00:18:08
Re: SR Rating    Mutami@???.com    07 Oct 1997 02:23:34
Re: SR Rating    Max Wilson    06 Oct 1997 12:23:24
Re: SR Rating    Max Wilson    07 Oct 1997 01:34:01
Re: SR Rating    Mutami@???.com    07 Oct 1997 22:32:04

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]