Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: PC Alignment
Next Message: Re: Ship builder
Month Index: September, 1997


From:     Grimwulf <slvf5@??.???.edu>
Date:     Thu, 04 Sep 1997 14:22:04 -0600 (MDT)
Subject:  Re: PC Alignment
On Wed, 3 Sep 1997, Jermy G. wrote:

>
> > 	I am asking this on all my AD&D list. We play with most of the
> > AD&D settings. So yes he can be considered Spelljammer. The reason I am
> > doing this is because the player thinks that this is Chaotic Good
> > Behavior. And the Player is stubborn about this. So I'm
> > 	showing him that most AD&D'ers do not agree with his
> > interpretation of alignments
>
>
> If he being so difficult maybe you should give a helm oposite alignment but
> make it alignment specific Lawful Good. So it would force a alignment
> change on him.
>
> Jeremy G.

If the player can't play Chaotic Good like he is supposed to, what makes
you think he would play Lawful Good like he was supposed to?  I would
even argue that Lawful Good is much harder to play than Chaotic Good,
pure Lawful Good that is.  Haven't yet played w/ a player with a Paladin
that was Lawful Good all the time--they always slipped up.

--Grimwulf


Previous Message: Re: PC Alignment
Next Message: Re: Ship builder
Month Index: September, 1997

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re: PC Alignment    Downer, Chris    03 Sep 1997 17:13:52
Re: PC Alignment    Jermy G.    03 Sep 1997 22:21:50
Re: PC Alignment    Jim Sheetz    04 Sep 1997 19:11:50
Re: PC Alignment    Grimwulf    04 Sep 1997 20:22:04

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]