Previous Message: Re: PC Alignment
Next Message: Re: Ship builder
Month Index: September, 1997
From: Grimwulf <slvf5@??.???.edu> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 1997 14:22:04 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: PC Alignment
On Wed, 3 Sep 1997, Jermy G. wrote: > > > I am asking this on all my AD&D list. We play with most of the > > AD&D settings. So yes he can be considered Spelljammer. The reason I am > > doing this is because the player thinks that this is Chaotic Good > > Behavior. And the Player is stubborn about this. So I'm > > showing him that most AD&D'ers do not agree with his > > interpretation of alignments > > > If he being so difficult maybe you should give a helm oposite alignment but > make it alignment specific Lawful Good. So it would force a alignment > change on him. > > Jeremy G. If the player can't play Chaotic Good like he is supposed to, what makes you think he would play Lawful Good like he was supposed to? I would even argue that Lawful Good is much harder to play than Chaotic Good, pure Lawful Good that is. Haven't yet played w/ a player with a Paladin that was Lawful Good all the time--they always slipped up. --Grimwulf
Previous Message: Re: PC Alignment
Next Message: Re: Ship builder
Month Index: September, 1997
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: PC Alignment | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: PC Alignment | Jermy G. | |||
| Re: PC Alignment | Jim Sheetz | |||
| Re: PC Alignment | Grimwulf |