Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Its time for another good idea bad idea
Next Message: Re: The shadows 2nd last posting
Month Index: September, 1997


From:     "Jermy G." <theguys@????????-??.com>
Date:     Wed, 3 Sep 1997 18:21:50 -0400
Subject:  Re: PC Alignment
> 	I am asking this on all my AD&D list. We play with most of the
> AD&D settings. So yes he can be considered Spelljammer. The reason I am
> doing this is because the player thinks that this is Chaotic Good
> Behavior. And the Player is stubborn about this. So I'm
> 	showing him that most AD&D'ers do not agree with his
> interpretation of alignments


If he being so difficult maybe you should give a helm oposite alignment but
make it alignment specific Lawful Good. So it would force a alignment
change on him.

Jeremy G.


Previous Message: Re: Its time for another good idea bad idea
Next Message: Re: The shadows 2nd last posting
Month Index: September, 1997

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re: PC Alignment    Downer, Chris    03 Sep 1997 17:13:52
Re: PC Alignment    Jermy G.    03 Sep 1997 22:21:50
Re: PC Alignment    Jim Sheetz    04 Sep 1997 19:11:50
Re: PC Alignment    Grimwulf    04 Sep 1997 20:22:04

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]