Re[2]: cloaking ships

     As has been pointed out allready, invisibility works on beings, not
     objects.  I'm sure someone could research a spell that allowed a ship
     to remain unseen, probably a fairly high level spell though.  How
     about using a purely visual illusion?  They can be quite large & last
     as long as the caster concentrates.  If the image of the ship were
     overlayed with an image of blank space noone should see it or at least
     it should be very difficult.  It will also give you a few attacks
     before your ship is pinpointed by the opposition & the illusion is
     disbelieved.

     dts


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: [SPELLJAMMER] - cloaking ships
Author:  scott@??????.????????.com at Internet
Date:    7/31/97 3:09 PM


>
>
> >  Otherwise I see it as having to burn a load of
> > invis 10'rad. spells and the first attack by the craft makes it so all
> > those
> > spells have to be cast over.
> >
> >
> The Inviso 10ft radius will servive more than one attack. The mages that
> will be station in certain locations through out the ship will not be
> attacking the enemy so the Inviso 10ft radius will stay up.
> ***************************************************************************
> To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@????.com with the line
> 'unsubscribe spelljammer' as the body of the message.
>

  Chris,
       The spell doeasn't care about the mages any attack shatters the
spell. At a maximum stretch the *mages* might remain invisible until *they*
attacked but the ship, and crew (the weapon and the user of the weapon)
would become visible.

        JMHO,
          Steve
***************************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@????.com with the line
'unsubscribe spelljammer' as the body of the message.

Received: from Mailer.symantec.com (198.6.49.5) by smtp-ima.symantec.com with
SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 0007C438; Thu, 31 Jul 97 14:35:43
-0700
Received: from phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM (Phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM [206.66.87.5])
by Mailer.symantec.com (8.8.4/8.7.6) with ESMTP id NAA02569 for
<jshafer@????????.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 13:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM
(8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA17928; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 16:29:14 -0400
Received: by lists.MPGN.COM (bulk_mailer v1.5); Thu, 31 Jul 1997 16:29:12 -0400
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM (8.7.3/8.6.9) id
QAA17471 for spelljammer-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 16:14:52 -0400
Received: from Mithril.MPGN.COM (Mithril.MPGN.COM [206.66.87.8]) by
phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA17386 for
<spelljammer@??????.????????.????.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 16:10:41 -0400
Received: from mirage.texmicro.com (mirage.texmicro.com [204.95.137.64]) by
Mithril.MPGN.COM (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA23406 for
<spelljammer@????.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 15:51:06 -0400
From: scott@??????.????????.com
Received: (from scott@localhost)
	by mirage.texmicro.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) id PAA00753
	for spelljammer@????.com; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 15:09:34 -0500
Message-Id: <199707312009.PAA00753@??????.????????.com>
Subject: Re: [SPELLJAMMER] - cloaking ships
To: spelljammer@????.com
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 15:09:34 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <0AB410E5234DD011A10B0000F84AE1B602D1D8F1@???????.?????????.com>
from "Downer, Chris" at Jul 31, 97 10:18:22 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-spelljammer@??????.????????.????.com
Reply-To: spelljammer@????.com