Re: spelljammer-digest V1996 #199

     oops...sent this to the previous author not the group...sorry.

     dts


______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Re: [SPELLJAMMER] - Re: spelljammer-digest V1996 #199



     If your goblinoids aren't a threat because of more than sheer numbers
     you might want to reread your monster compendiums.  Orcs are as a
     smart and strong as a human or any other demi-human.  So are the scro.
      For ever genius human there will be a genius orc and for every fifth
     level human fighter there will be an orcish hero who has reached the
     same level.  You might want to give more credit to the monsters--they
     aren't just a set of numbers on a page.  They DO think independantly
     and should have good ideas just like the PCs.  IMC a patrol of orcs is
     cause to hide in the bushes, not draw your sword and say "C'mon guys,
     there's only 4 of them for each of us so ya better hurry!"

     Other goblinoids have their strengths too.  Kobolds for example can be
     wrapped in netting and used as equipment in a lively game of Ko-ball

     dts




______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: [SPELLJAMMER] - Re: spelljammer-digest V1996 #199
Author:  "Hakan Koseoglu" <hkose@???.???.tr> at Internet
Date:    7/31/97 10:28 AM




> *Goblin-kin are weak.  The stardard goblin, orc, and kobold is less than
> 1 HD.  I've found that they are too pitiful to send against any party of
> higher level than 6th (I believe that most spelljamming officers would
> be a minimum of 8th, just to afford the finances of the game).  So thus,
> unless a crew parked they're ship next to the Citadel of Many Arrows,
> goblins would be unable to take the ship by force.
They can reproduce very quickly and be a threat.


***************************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@????.com with the line
'unsubscribe spelljammer' as the body of the message.

Received: from Mailer.symantec.com (198.6.49.5) by smtp-ima.symantec.com with
SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 0007B180; Thu, 31 Jul 97 01:31:17
-0700
Received: from phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM (Phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM [206.66.87.5])
by Mailer.symantec.com (8.8.4/8.7.6) with ESMTP id BAA19999 for
<jshafer@????????.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 01:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM
(8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA29418; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 04:03:04 -0400
Received: by lists.MPGN.COM (bulk_mailer v1.5); Thu, 31 Jul 1997 04:03:02 -0400
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM (8.7.3/8.6.9) id
EAA29382 for spelljammer-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 04:02:22 -0400
Received: from Mithril.MPGN.COM (Mithril.MPGN.COM [206.66.87.8]) by
phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id DAA29056 for
<spelljammer@??????.????????.????.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 03:56:52 -0400
Received: from linux.ada.com.tr (linux.ada.com.tr [195.142.130.1]) by
Mithril.MPGN.COM (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id DAA16022 for
<spelljammer@????.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 03:37:22 -0400
Received: from hakan (pppd101.ada.com.tr [195.142.130.30])
	by linux.ada.com.tr (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA21372
	for <spelljammer@????.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 10:58:02 +0300
Message-Id: <199707310758.KAA21372@?????.???.???.tr>
From: "Hakan Koseoglu" <hkose@???.???.tr>
To: <spelljammer@????.com>
Subject: [SPELLJAMMER] - Re: spelljammer-digest V1996 #199
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 10:28:08 +0300
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1157
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-spelljammer@??????.????????.????.com
Reply-To: spelljammer@????.com