Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: cloaking ships
Next Message: Re: cloaking ships
Month Index: August, 1997


From:     "Downer, Chris" <Chris.Downer@???????.?????????.com>
Date:     Thu, 31 Jul 1997 15:36:13 -0500
Subject:  Re: Re[2]: cloaking ships
> Again, the same problem applies as with Invis 10'rad:  to my
> knowledge,
> all invisibility-type spells work on a number of BEINGS, not mass.
> Otherwise, you'd make the land you're standing on invisible, which
> would
> be a glaringly obvious indication that a party is moving in.  Aside
> from
> that, in forest, it'd suck if trees turn invisible as you near them...
>
	I don't have my book with me but I am pretty sure it is not the
number or being but the area that is affected i.e Inviability 10 Foot
Radius


Previous Message: Re: cloaking ships
Next Message: Re: cloaking ships
Month Index: August, 1997

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re[2]: cloaking ships    Jonathan Stevenson    31 Jul 1997 17:42:57
Re: Re[2]: cloaking ships    Pran Mukherjee    31 Jul 1997 18:56:11
Re: Re[2]: cloaking ships    Downer, Chris    31 Jul 1997 20:36:13
Re[2]: cloaking ships    Jason Shafer    31 Jul 1997 23:35:38
Re[2]: cloaking ships    Jonathan Stevenson    01 Aug 1997 13:29:37
Re: Re[2]: cloaking ships    Cloud-Bard@?????????.com    01 Aug 1997 17:00:20

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]