Previous Message: Re: Unhuman War
Next Message: Re: Re[2]: cloaking ships
Month Index: August, 1997
From: scott@??????.????????.com Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 15:09:34 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: cloaking ships
>
>
> > Otherwise I see it as having to burn a load of
> > invis 10'rad. spells and the first attack by the craft makes it so all
> > those
> > spells have to be cast over.
> >
> >
> The Inviso 10ft radius will servive more than one attack. The mages that
> will be station in certain locations through out the ship will not be
> attacking the enemy so the Inviso 10ft radius will stay up.
> ***************************************************************************
> To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@????.com with the line
> 'unsubscribe spelljammer' as the body of the message.
>
Chris,
The spell doeasn't care about the mages any attack shatters the
spell. At a maximum stretch the *mages* might remain invisible until *they*
attacked but the ship, and crew (the weapon and the user of the weapon)
would become visible.
JMHO,
Steve
Previous Message: Re: Unhuman War
Next Message: Re: Re[2]: cloaking ships
Month Index: August, 1997
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: cloaking ships | Cloud-Bard@?????????.com | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Cloud-Bard@?????????.com | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Pran Mukherjee | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Downer, Chris | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Jeremy G. | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | scott@??????.????????.com | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Spike | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | scott@??????.????????.com | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Cloud-Bard@?????????.com | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Brett Lang | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Mutami@???.com | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Hand of God | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Cloud-Bard@?????????.com | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | Chard999@???.com | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | S. Wilson | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | S. Wilson | |||
| Re: cloaking ships | S. Wilson |