Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Wild Mages and Spelljamming helms
Next Message: Re: Capital Ships
Month Index: July, 1997


From:     Chip Marshall <chip@???.net>
Date:     Mon, 7 Jul 1997 14:13:52 -0400
Subject:  Re: Magi in Black
I don't see why evil alignments would be let in. It sounds like a
'for the good of the planet' type thing, which I don't think evil
would be a part of. I do agree that chaotic should be left out, as
it does require I lot of rules to maintain that kind of secrecy over
and entire planet.

David Starner wrote:
> At 10:31 AM 7/7/97 -0400, you wrote:
> >     Range of alignments: LN, NG, N, NE, CN.
>
> Cool idea! Whenever I have a spelljammer campaign again, I'll have to use
> these guys. I'm not sure about the alignment. Due to the tight nature of
> the organization, I would think that they would discourage chaotic alignments
> from joining, as lacking the control and stability to constantly hide the
> organization from everybody. I would have put the organizational alignment
> as LN and given the range of alignments as: LN, LG, LE, NG, TN, NE.
> David Starner - deos@????.net
> Nullius in Verba

--
Chip Marshall <chip@???.net>
http://www.jlc.net/~chip/                  InterNIC handle -  CLM21
Key fingerprint =  BA B1 8E 14 60 C6 10 32  18 24 C6 F1 D5 CC 80 52


Previous Message: Re: Wild Mages and Spelljamming helms
Next Message: Re: Capital Ships
Month Index: July, 1997

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re: Magi in Black    Mystaros@???.com    07 Jul 1997 14:31:38
Re: Magi in Black    David Starner    07 Jul 1997 16:31:33
Re: Magi in Black    Chip Marshall    07 Jul 1997 18:13:52
Re: Magi in Black    Mystaros@???.com    08 Jul 1997 02:43:35

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]