Previous Message: Re: GURPS Current conversions and a revision
Next Message: Re: GURPS Current conversions and a revision
Month Index: May, 1997
From: Donald Dean <ddean1@????.org> Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 02:47:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: GURPS Current conversions and a revision
On Sun, 11 May 1997, David Starner wrote: > >sense. (I really dislike Beholders. They are so obviously an > >artificial creature). On a further note, I am doing an "evolution" of > >the Illithid, both as an explaination of them, and as a GURPS > >conversion. > > The average sphere has far more creatures than that. Not only that, why > should elves, humans, and tinker gnomes be the only land races in space? > Surely dwarves and all the other races would have gone too. (Tinker Gnomes > make sense???) Scro are also a very good space race, in part as a > replacement for all the humanoids the average party slaughters on land. > On a side note, I frankly prefer diversity in my campaign and feel that it > would exist where we have all these enormous number of spheres. To say the > entire AD&D space universe only contains 5 creatures is pretty limiting. > David Starner - deos@????.net > *************************************************************************** I had forgotten about the scro completely. But I agree that you need more than just five races, and for the beholders. I din't know they seem to be so much more interested in doing away with themselves, that I don't mind them much.
Previous Message: Re: GURPS Current conversions and a revision
Next Message: Re: GURPS Current conversions and a revision
Month Index: May, 1997