Re: PRESS RELEASE: Wizards of the Coast to acquire TSR

>----------
>From: 	Sebastian[SMTP:willow9@?????????.com]
>Sent: 	Monday, April 14, 1997 3:24 AM
>To: 	spelljammer@????.com
>Subject: 	Re: [SPELLJAMMER] - PRESS RELEASE:  Wizards of the Coast to acquire
>TSR
>
>> I was wondering the same thing...or maybe now WOTC will make Spellfire
>> playable. :)
>>
>> >Your shitting me. So does that mean that Magic will start useing D&D
>> >monsters and Spells lets hop[e so. See you Saturday.
>
>	Spellfire, in my opinion, is a much better game than Magic.  It
>takes real strategy to put together a Spellfire deck, and it is much
>more fun to play in groups.  Magic is all fine and good, but Spellfire
>rules the day around here.  I know that was off topic, but I just
>couldn't stand not to comment.  :)
>
>- Sebastian

I must disagree with you. I have been playing both games for years. And
I find that Magic is a lot more versitil than Spellfire. You can apply
more combanations in Magic than in Spellfire. As far as group play Magic
beats Spellfire hands down. The Emperior Game is the best form of
multiplayer Magic Game in my opinion. But there are a lot of different
type of multiplayer magic games out there. In fact prefere multi-play to
one-on-one play.



>***************************************************************************
>To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@????.com with the line
>'unsubscribe spelljammer' as the body of the message.
>