Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: relative magic levels, groundling Vs spacer
Next Message: Re: Spacers vs. groundling nations
Month Index: March, 1997


From:     Eugene Shumu1insky <static@??.???.????.edu>
Date:     Fri, 28 Mar 1997 11:32:58 -0500 (EST)
Subject:  Re: Gravity theory
Greetings,

In our last episode, Tavenji@???.com said:
[Snip]
>   *Sigh*  Once again, we Gravity-On-Contact people only believe that an
>object powered by a helm can resist gravity and maintain its own G-plane.
> We've said nothing about rocs, jumping giants, pickles, or people who stand
>too close to ledges.  While it is fun to make such observations, it
>misrepresents our argument.  And if you don't stop, I'm going to cry.  Big
>crocodile tears, too.
>   *Sniff*
>
>   Now see what you've done....;-)

	No need to cry.  I agree with your pushing bombs off the gravity
plane idea.  I just don't know if all the gravti-on-contact people have
thought of it.  You are obviously smarter than the rest... (:

	So you see, I wasn't misrepresening. :)

-Static

--
                         "Read more, kill less."

       --==<< http://k2.CWRU.edu/~static (Stories and Games) >>==--


Previous Message: Re: relative magic levels, groundling Vs spacer
Next Message: Re: Spacers vs. groundling nations
Month Index: March, 1997

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Gravity theory    Pran Mukherjee    27 Mar 1997 18:36:12
Re: Gravity theory    Tavenji@???.com    28 Mar 1997 13:49:10
Re: Gravity theory    Eugene Shumu1insky    28 Mar 1997 16:32:58
Re: Gravity theory    gantr@???.edu    28 Mar 1997 18:28:12
Re: Gravity theory    Rob Stiles    31 Mar 1997 17:54:33

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]