Previous Message: Re: Star Trek to Spelljammer
Next Message: Re: Ship Drawing Program
Month Index: January, 1997
From: Johndolar7@???.com Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 12:18:00 -0500 Subject: Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace
In a message dated 97-01-06 01:44:13 EST, JMcF@???????.com (JAMES E MCFARLAND) writes: > I think the dinamics(sp?) of sex in wildspace would depend mostly on > survival value. Think about it. If the pair (or trio, or whatever) > moved out far enough to be in "true" freefall, their air would run > out really quickly (they are doing some pretty heavy breathing, after > all). The only way they could simulate freefall is if they pushed > away from a ship and stayed on the gravity plane. This would require > the ship to be motionless an away from a planet or other gravity > boasting body, which means that *all* of the crew would know what's > going on, and would probably herd to the rail to watch the specticle. > (sp?) Remember that you don't need to leave the ship to float on the gravity plane. I admit, most ships are configured so that one of the gravity plane runs through one of the decks... but not all. Anyway you could cut out a section of a deck if you realy wanted to try it and your Captain didn't mind. I cant belive I'm talking about this.
Previous Message: Re: Star Trek to Spelljammer
Next Message: Re: Ship Drawing Program
Month Index: January, 1997
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace | JAMES E MCFARLAND | |||
| Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace | Ziggy | |||
| Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace | Johndolar7@???.com |