Previous Message: Star Trek to Spelljammer
Next Message: Re: Star Trek to Spelljammer
Month Index: January, 1997
From: Ziggy <jperry@??.net> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 07:37:01 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace
>I think the dinamics(sp?) of sex in wildspace would depend mostly on
>survival value. Think about it. If the pair (or trio, or whatever)
>moved out far enough to be in "true" freefall, their air would run
>out really quickly (they are doing some pretty heavy breathing, after
>all). The only way they could simulate freefall is if they pushed
>away from a ship and stayed on the gravity plane. This would require
>the ship to be motionless an away from a planet or other gravity
>boasting body, which means that *all* of the crew would know what's
>going on, and would probably herd to the rail to watch the specticle.
>(sp?)
(that's dynamics and spectacle)...
and, would it really matter if the crew saw them on a two or three person
ship? hmm...the 3,000,000,000 mile high club. :)
___________
| ----- |
| / |
| / |
| / |
| -----IGGY |
|___________|
\o/
#
/'\
Previous Message: Star Trek to Spelljammer
Next Message: Re: Star Trek to Spelljammer
Month Index: January, 1997
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace | JAMES E MCFARLAND | |||
| Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace | Ziggy | |||
| Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace | Johndolar7@???.com |