Previous Message: Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace
Next Message: Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace
Month Index: January, 1997
From: JAMES E MCFARLAND <JMcF@???????.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 01:22:50, -0500 Subject: Re: Star Trek to Spelljammer
I've read over what I've seen on the ST to SJ conversion so far, and I'm not overly impressed. I'm not sure the write-up devised would work very well with a "purist" Spelljammer setting. It seems more like you are taking just the ship and it's crew and shoving it into the SJ universe. For instance, the Computer. Computers, while necessary aboard a science based starship, would not meld very well with a magic based spelljammer. One item I think should be made praiseworthy, the notes on encountering the "Galactic Barrier", using psionics based rules to determine what happens to whom. That goes along the lines of a more AD&D based system. ...And no, I'm not going on like this because I did the other ST=>SJ writup. ;) Chris McFarland ____ Christopher J. McFarland President and Founder of the Sailor Moon Society International
Previous Message: Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace
Next Message: Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace
Month Index: January, 1997
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Star Trek to Spelljammer | JAMES E MCFARLAND | |||
| Re: Star Trek to Spelljammer | steve swenson | |||
| Re: Star Trek to Spelljammer | John W. Bowden |