Previous Message: Re: Sex in Wildspace
Next Message: Star Trek to Spelljammer
Month Index: January, 1997
From: JAMES E MCFARLAND <JMcF@???????.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 01:16:44, -0500 Subject: Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace
I think the dinamics(sp?) of sex in wildspace would depend mostly on survival value. Think about it. If the pair (or trio, or whatever) moved out far enough to be in "true" freefall, their air would run out really quickly (they are doing some pretty heavy breathing, after all). The only way they could simulate freefall is if they pushed away from a ship and stayed on the gravity plane. This would require the ship to be motionless an away from a planet or other gravity boasting body, which means that *all* of the crew would know what's going on, and would probably herd to the rail to watch the specticle. (sp?) There's my thoughts. Chris ____ Christopher J. McFarland President and Founder of the Sailor Moon Society International
Previous Message: Re: Sex in Wildspace
Next Message: Star Trek to Spelljammer
Month Index: January, 1997
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace | JAMES E MCFARLAND | |||
| Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace | Ziggy | |||
| Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace | Johndolar7@???.com |