Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Sex in Wildspace
Next Message: Star Trek to Spelljammer
Month Index: January, 1997


From:      JAMES E MCFARLAND <JMcF@???????.com>
Date:     Mon,  6 Jan 1997 01:16:44, -0500
Subject:  Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace
I think the dinamics(sp?) of sex in wildspace would depend mostly on
survival value.  Think about it.  If the pair (or trio, or whatever)
moved out far enough to be in "true" freefall, their air would run
out really quickly (they are doing some pretty heavy breathing, after
all).  The only way they could simulate freefall is if they pushed
away from a ship and stayed on the gravity plane.  This would require
the ship to be motionless an away from a planet or other gravity
boasting body, which means that *all* of the crew would know what's
going on, and would probably herd to the rail to watch the specticle.
(sp?)

There's my thoughts.
Chris

____
Christopher J. McFarland
President and Founder of the Sailor Moon Society International


Previous Message: Re: Sex in Wildspace
Next Message: Star Trek to Spelljammer
Month Index: January, 1997

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace    JAMES E MCFARLAND    06 Jan 1997 06:16:44
Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace    Ziggy    06 Jan 1997 13:37:01
Re: [Spelljammer] Sex in wildspace    Johndolar7@???.com    06 Jan 1997 17:18:00

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]