Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Silence
Next Message: Re: Size of Fleets
Month Index: September, 1996


From:     SJammer123@???.com
Date:     Wed, 18 Sep 1996 23:27:39 -0400
Subject:  Re: Fwd: FW: Re: silence
In a message dated 96-09-18 23:26:34 EDT, tomjr@???.com (Thomas O. Magann
Jr.) writes:

<< >>>So it really doesn't matter who's at fault, just who's unpopular.
Right.
 >>>You'll kiss ass on this list, but I won't, so I'm dumped. I understand.
 >>
 >>        You're damn right I'll kiss ass on the list.  It's my list, and
I'll
 >>do what I have to do to keep it going strong.  When one person's posting
 >>style becomes offence, I have to take action.  You're like the person who
 >>goes around a party starting arguments.
 >
 >Odd, I have an earlier post where you admit that I'm not the one starting
them, just responding
 >to them. Can't you even keep what you say straight?
 >
 > I'm the host who's escorting you to
 >>the door, in the interest of greater order.
 >>        You seem to be having trouble grasping something.  It's not so
much
 >>what you say that's offensive, but how you say it.
 >
 >And you don't seem to grasp that you admit to punishing someone other than
the one starting the
 >problems, while letting the folks doing the satring continue in a like
vien. This is how you fix
 >things? By keep ing the source of the problems?
 >
 >Odd logic system you have.
 >
 >
 >>>Thank You For Your Time,
 >>
 >>        You're quite welcome, but don't expect any more of it.  I warned
 >>you, and you lasted less than ten minutes.  Posting my personal message to
 >>you was totally uncalled for, but I guess you're entitled to go out with a
roar.
 >
 >UNCALLED FOR? LIKE THREATENING MY PERSONAL AND PRIVATE MAIL WAS CALLED FOR,
OR DIDN'T YOU EVEN
 >READ MY RESPONSE? YOU BROUGHT PERSONAL MAIL INTO IT, AND MADE MY PERSONAL
MAIL A PUBLIC ISSUE.
 >
 >Why am I not entitled to do the same? Once again, all I did was respond in
kind, and I'm wrong,
 >but you're not? Do you get confused about which rules apply to who, or are
you immune to being
 >treated as you treat others?
 >
 >It was quite called for. At least as much as your making MY private mail an
issue was,
 especially
 >as the only complaints you've ever recieved about my personal posts were
from folks who STARTED
 >the private correspondence, and you *KNOW* it.
 > >>


---------------------
Forwarded message:
From:	tomjr@???.com (Thomas O. Magann Jr.)
To:	sjammer123@???.com
Date: 96-09-18 23:26:34 EDT


On Wed, 18 Sep 96 20:21:20 PDT  Thomas O. Magann Jr. wrote:
>
>>
>>>So it really doesn't matter who's at fault, just who's unpopular. Right.
>>>You'll kiss ass on this list, but I won't, so I'm dumped. I understand.
>>
>>        You're damn right I'll kiss ass on the list.  It's my list, and
I'll
>>do what I have to do to keep it going strong.  When one person's posting
>>style becomes offence, I have to take action.  You're like the person who
>>goes around a party starting arguments.
>
>Odd, I have an earlier post where you admit that I'm not the one starting
them, just responding
>to them. Can't you even keep what you say straight?
>
> I'm the host who's escorting you to
>>the door, in the interest of greater order.
>>        You seem to be having trouble grasping something.  It's not so much
>>what you say that's offensive, but how you say it.
>
>And you don't seem to grasp that you admit to punishing someone other than
the one starting the
>problems, while letting the folks doing the satring continue in a like vien.
This is how you fix
>things? By keep ing the source of the problems?
>
>Odd logic system you have.
>
>
>>>Thank You For Your Time,
>>
>>        You're quite welcome, but don't expect any more of it.  I warned
>>you, and you lasted less than ten minutes.  Posting my personal message to
>>you was totally uncalled for, but I guess you're entitled to go out with a
roar.
>
>UNCALLED FOR? LIKE THREATENING MY PERSONAL AND PRIVATE MAIL WAS CALLED FOR,
OR DIDN'T YOU EVEN
>READ MY RESPONSE? YOU BROUGHT PERSONAL MAIL INTO IT, AND MADE MY PERSONAL
MAIL A PUBLIC ISSUE.
>
>Why am I not entitled to do the same? Once again, all I did was respond in
kind, and I'm wrong,
>but you're not? Do you get confused about which rules apply to who, or are
you immune to being
>treated as you treat others?
>
>It was quite called for. At least as much as your making MY private mail an
issue was,
especially
>as the only complaints you've ever recieved about my personal posts were
from folks who STARTED
>the private correspondence, and you *KNOW* it.
>
>
>
>
>Thank You For Your Time,
>
>Thomas O Magann Jr
>http://www.sfo.com/~tomjr/
>
><tomjr@???.com> or my back-up: <TMagann@???.com>
>
>
>


Thank You For Your Time,

Thomas O Magann Jr
http://www.sfo.com/~tomjr/

<tomjr@???.com> or my back-up: <TMagann@???.com>





Previous Message: Re: Silence
Next Message: Re: Size of Fleets
Month Index: September, 1996

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]