Re: Devient& Tom M.

>
>The reason was simple, I didn't think to send it privately.  Fortunately my
>opinion of myself is too high for me to consider my oversight an indication
>of idiocy or hypocricy.  Your response does not make it seem you were
>amused,  and I think my post made it clear I did not intend to offend.
>Yours seems clearly designed to do just that, so I ask,  what did I say
>that deserved this response?

No, apparently ytou were just thoughtless.

Now you've flamed publicly, instead of privately, as you earlier requested.

I responded, so I'll be kicked from the list, But the fact that you felt it
necessary to send a flame to the list, after requesting they be taken private
probably won't even get you a note from the moderator.

It does *now* show hypocrisy on your part, though.

>Oh, yes,  I felt it was appropriate to make this post public,  Mr. Magann.
>Thank _You_ for your time.
>
>PS: Sorry, Richard,  but I could not let that pass.

So that makes failing to follow your own advice permissible?

You couldn't have sent it privately?




Thank You For Your Time,

Thomas O Magann Jr
http://www.sfo.com/~tomjr/

<tomjr@???.com> or my back-up: <TMagann@???.com>