Previous Message: My Ship Construction Rules Changes
Next Message: Re: SSI SJ Game?
Month Index: June, 1996
From: sinny@?????????.net Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 08:31:30 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: A New Class for the SJ setting...
> > >On Sun, 23 Jun 1996, Thomas O. Magann Jr. wrote: > >> > At this point, though, I came to a problem of logisitcs. The helm, >> >though only capable of tactical speeds, still needs to be piloted by a >> >mage or priest. And since I envision these ships as being fairly fast, >> >they would have to be piloted by higher level characters. And the idea of >> >fleets of these ships being piloted by high level mages starts to strain >> >believability. >> >> Instead of (or as well as) a whole specialty class (and one that's going to >> be taking heavy casualties, as their the front runners of any battle, so >> there's going to be a shortage), you can also do a couple of other things. > > This aspect isn't really a problem. The Elven Imperial Fleet is a bit >more trim in my world. There is no second Unhuman War on the horizon, so >the Fleet is lean and mean. Most will see little action. > _But_, should the need arise, the elves can muster a huge number of >reserves. There are high number of young elves on various planets just >waiting for a chance to get into space. > Something big would have to happen before casulties become a problem. > >> For instance, a Ring of the Orbus can be standard equipment. There's on point >> of speed, or, if the elves make these Tactical Helms, they could use Orbuses >> in the enchantment, and make the Helm's innately +1 SR. > > This may just be my own campaign style, but orbus rings will never be >common enough for a whole fleet to be equipped with them. > >> Also, the pilots could learn the Spelljamming proficeincy from the CSHB. > > The Spelljamming does not grant a +1 in my campaigns (just a personal >preference kind of thing.) > >> And, if the elves have access to an Aracokra ship yard, there's another +1. > > Again, based on personal preference, Aarakocra ships get no such >bonus, at least not in space. (IMHO this was a lame concept. The idea >that a race's knowledge of aerodynamics is going to mean anything to a >spelljamming ship is ludicrous. Yes, I know it's a fantasy setting, but >this leaps into the Silly Section.) > >> And all of these are more easily renewable resources than one based on the >> breeding curve of the elves. And they allow mages, priests and bards to run >> the ships. > > Well, all except for the Orbus Rings. > > Sorry for all the "That's not how it is in my campaigns" answers. >This wasn't meant as an attack. I just have certain notions on how things >work in SJ, and these don't fit. > Like most people, I'm sure, I adjust the setting to suit me >conceptions. > After the initial boxed set some of the people who contributed to the >SJ setting added some silly concepts. Aerodynamic space ships is one of >them (good for flying through atmospheres, irrellevant in space), as well >as basing a ship's space stats on weight (like the ship construction >system in WCC). But this is just MHO. > > > Leroy Van Camp III > owner-mystara-l@??.com van891@??????.edu >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > "You know, not kneeing you in the groin is a constant struggle." >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > MST3K > > >About Creating a new helm to power this ship. Not necessary, in the Ship Recongition manual there is mention a 200 ton ship call the ark or zoo ship. It is powered by major serie helm. Love the idea about new flitter. the old ones lack any offensive punch. sinny > >
Previous Message: My Ship Construction Rules Changes
Next Message: Re: SSI SJ Game?
Month Index: June, 1996
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A New Class for the SJ setting... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Thomas O. Magann Jr. | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Shelby Michlin | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Thomas O. Magann Jr. | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | sinny@?????????.net | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Eugene Shumu1insky | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Eugene Shumu1insky | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Thomas O. Magann Jr. | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Ken Lipka | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Jamie Cavanagh | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Jamie Cavanagh | |||
| A New Class for the SJ setting... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Ken Lipka | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Jamie Cavanagh |