Previous Message: Re: A New Class for the SJ setting...
Next Message: Armadas (was Re: A New Class for the SJ setting...)
Month Index: June, 1996
From: Shelby Michlin <shelby7@??.??????.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 96 11:01:45 -0500 Subject: Re: A New Class for the SJ setting...
-- [ From: Shelby Michlin * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- -------- REPLY, Original message follows -------- > Date: Sunday, 23-Jun-96 09:03 AM > > From: Leroy Van Camp III \ Internet: (van891@??????.edu) > To: Multiple recipients of list \ Internet: (spelljammer@?????????.ac .uk) > > Subject: [SPELLJAMMER:1299] Re: Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... > > On Sun, 23 Jun 1996, Paul Westermeyer wrote: <snip> > The primary purpose of the Firefly is a close assault. The typical > strategy is to put as many fireflies against a ship as possible, while still > covering all ships. > The typical attack run involves flying up behind or to the side of a bigger > ship, so it can't try a ram, and fire its heavy weapon, usually from one hex > away. It then makes a pass over the ship, trying to rip away rigging with its > shears. It then loops around, while the weapon is reloaded, for another run. > Although a good shoot from a heavier weapon will destroy a firefly, most of > the crew will probably survive. And since the bigger ship is still going to > have to deal with a dozen more fireflies, it isn't going to have time to finish > off the helpless crew. So, if the ship is destroyed, it is a simple matter of > going around and picking up casulties. > Note that the ship has a bigger weapon than it should be carrying, and has > too many crew members, when including the weaponeers. This will decrease > breathable air. This isn't really a problem, though, since the ship is not a > long range vessel. It is unlikely to be away from its Armada transport for any > longer than a day, at most. > Some fireflies carry greek fire projectors, spraying the decks of the > target ship as it shears rigging. <snip> -------- REPLY, End of original message -------- OK, perhaps this is an old topic, but I never saw much use for the original flitter. It has no mounted weapon, usually no helm, and carries one elf. Is the only real purpose of a flitter as a means to armor a boarder? Can he really pop out of the thing quickly when reaching the enemy vessel? Doesn't seem like a good idea, but maybe I'm missing something. I've always had a problem with this... Shelby
Previous Message: Re: A New Class for the SJ setting...
Next Message: Armadas (was Re: A New Class for the SJ setting...)
Month Index: June, 1996
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A New Class for the SJ setting... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Thomas O. Magann Jr. | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Shelby Michlin | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Paul Westermeyer | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Thomas O. Magann Jr. | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | sinny@?????????.net | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Eugene Shumu1insky | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Eugene Shumu1insky | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Thomas O. Magann Jr. | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Ken Lipka | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Jamie Cavanagh | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Jamie Cavanagh | |||
| A New Class for the SJ setting... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Ken Lipka | |||
| Re: A New Class for the SJ setting... | Jamie Cavanagh |