Previous Message: Re: More on Air Consumption...
Next Message: Re: More on Air Consumption...
Month Index: June, 1996
From: "Thomas O. Magann Jr." <tomjr@???.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 96 10:52:19 PDT Subject: Re: More on Air Consumption...
> You're right in assuming that I used sea level pressures to start >with, but it says in the rules somewhere that atmosphere is also a bit >binary in nature. It's eithere there or it's not there. Not that I agree >with what they say... (: I'm assuming that an active helm will be able >to keep the pressure "at sea level." Actually, not's not quite what they say. Page 11 of the Concordanance describes the air as thinning with altitude. On Page 7 they comment that the thin air eventually becomes unbreatheable, but, at that point a person starts breathing air brought along with them in their own envelope. Which implies that envelopes aren't formed at sea level pressure, but at level quite a bit thinner, although still thick enough to breath. >>Also, even wih the ship moving at SJ speeds the crew will be anything but >>inactive. In addition to the normal maintainence a ship requires, and certain >>basic jobs that always need to be done, there's a far amount of make work so >>hat the ship's crew isn't idle. Idle crews mutiny far more than active and >>busy crews. Marines and weapon crews also need to drill to keep their edge >>and their combat readyness. All this uses more air. > > Yup. But the stats given in the paper I read say that *on average* >the SCFH is equal to 1, over long term. Short term (like fighting with only >your own air envelope) will probably change that. I'm ex Navy. trust me, on a cruise, activity levels for the deck crew (which is every one but the Officers in a non tech setting) rarely averages the same as in more sedate jobs. >>Also, every bit of trash and garbage thrown over the side, and every missle >>shot at another ship will take a bit air along with it as it leaves the >>ship's air envelope further reducing the amount of usable air. > > Yeah, but that probably adds up to less than a cubic foot per day, >but more during heavy combat. Actually, a cubic foot of trash takes 8 cubic feet of air along with it. How much trash do you think is generated by, say, 30 people? Remeber, this includes sewage, water from the galley, a lot scraps and trimming from food preperation. Wash water from scrubbing the decks, etc. > > Please keep in mind that I'm saying that anybody's figures are >wrong. I'm just trying to figure this thing out, like everybody else... (: I understand that. I'm pointing out certain flaws in your assumptions, is all. I think you are severely underestimating loss to waste, and the ambient pressure, and the like. Thank You For Your Time, Thomas O Magann Jr http://www.sfo.com/~tomjr/ <tomjr@???.com> or my back-up: <TMagann@???.com>
Previous Message: Re: More on Air Consumption...
Next Message: Re: More on Air Consumption...
Month Index: June, 1996
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| More on Air Consumption... | Leroy Van Camp III | |||
| Re: More on Air Consumption... | Eugene Shumu1insky | |||
| Re: More on Air Consumption... | Thomas O. Magann Jr. | |||
| Re: More on Air Consumption... | Eugene Shumu1insky | |||
| Re: More on Air Consumption... | Thomas O. Magann Jr. | |||
| Re: More on Air Consumption... | Deviant | |||
| Re: More on Air Consumption... | Eugene Shumu1insky | |||
| Re: More on Air Consumption... | Thomas O. Magann Jr. | |||
| Re: More on Air Consumption... | Russ 'Argel' LeBar | |||
| Re: More on Air Consumption... | Don Weis | |||
| Re: More on Air Consumption... | Thomas O. Magann Jr. |