Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: The Belt
Next Message: Re: Future
Month Index: March, 1996


From:     "Thomas O. Magann Jr." <tomjr@???.com>
Date:     Wed, 20 Mar 96 09:57:31 PST
Subject:  Re: The Future of Spelljammer
>On Wednesday 20th, DJR writes:
>Thanks Thomas, your comments make me think I will have to go back and
>re-read the info on the SPELLJAMMER.
>I don't remember the info about never being able to leave.
>What I am trying to do is get across the idea that the whole universe had
>shifted at a real fundemental
>level. Taking the SPELLJAMMER and making it something that is still
>powerful, ancient and mysterious
>but at the same time something that is being coming more commonplace. This
>concept to me represented
>that shift.

Read the boxed set about it. It has it's own priorities and the like, and is
pretty timeless.



Thank You For Your Time,

Thomas O Magann Jr
http://www.sfo.com/~tomjr/

<tomjr@???.com> or my back-up: <TMagann@???.com>




Previous Message: The Belt
Next Message: Re: Future
Month Index: March, 1996

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
The Future of Spelljammer    Douglas Russell    19 Mar 1996 14:27:00
Re: The Future of Spelljammer    Mike Phillips    19 Mar 1996 16:25:27
Re: The Future of Spelljammer    Paul Westermeyer    19 Mar 1996 16:38:45
Re: The Future of Spelljammer    Thomas O. Magann Jr.    19 Mar 1996 17:26:27
Re: The Future of Spelljammer    sean@???????.????????.com    20 Mar 1996 02:09:53
Re: The Future of Spelljammer    Douglas J Russell    20 Mar 1996 15:14:00
Re: The Future of Spelljammer    Douglas J Russell    20 Mar 1996 15:23:00
Re: The Future of Spelljammer    Thomas O. Magann Jr.    20 Mar 1996 17:57:31

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]