Search SJML Archives! (Powered by Google)

Previous Message: Re: Psi in Space
Next Message: Action!
Month Index: September, 1995


From:     "Thomas O. Magann Jr." <tomjr@???.com>
Date:     Mon, 25 Sep 95 20:22:56 PDT
Subject:  Re: Psi in Space
>> The rules already take this into account with punching damage (only 1/4
of
>> which is real)
>
>    Yeah, but that wasn't my point.  My point is that I see an attack of
>such nature as less effective against a solid barrier such as a wooden
>hull.  As it stands, four such attacks stand a good chance of destroying
>a four ton Wreckboat, which is silly.
>    When the author wrote the description for Project Force, he had flesh
>in mind.  And in this case, I don't believe flesh and wood will respond
>in the same way.  So, I gave the hull a bonus to it's AR, which is used
>to calculate damage from the attack (1d6+AC).

Well, on this one we disagree. I think that there are plenty of examples
that say otherwise.


Thank You For Your Time,

Thomas O Magann Jr
tomjr@???.com
Or my back-up: TMagann@???.com
http://www.sfo.com/~tomjr




Previous Message: Re: Psi in Space
Next Message: Action!
Month Index: September, 1995

SubjectFromDate (UTC)
Psi in Space    Orion    26 Sep 1995 00:57:08
Re: Psi in Space    Thomas O. Magann Jr.    26 Sep 1995 01:12:52
Re: Psi in Space    Orion    26 Sep 1995 02:13:04
Re: Psi in Space    Thomas O. Magann Jr.    26 Sep 1995 02:38:25
Re: Psi in Space    Orion    26 Sep 1995 03:15:56
Re: Psi in Space    Thomas O. Magann Jr.    26 Sep 1995 03:22:56
Re: Psi in Space    Ken Lipka    26 Sep 1995 11:47:37
Re: Psi in Space    Thomas O. Magann Jr.    26 Sep 1995 11:59:49
Re: Psi in Space    Orion    26 Sep 1995 12:26:52
Re: Psi in Space    Ken Lipka    26 Sep 1995 14:14:30
Re: Psi in Space    Thomas O. Magann Jr.    26 Sep 1995 16:58:40
Psi in Space    Ken Lipka    26 Sep 1995 18:25:20

[ SPJ-L@Cornell.edu ] [ Spelljammer@Leicester.ac.uk ] [ Spelljammer@MPGN.com ] [ Spelljammer-L@Oracle.Wizards.com ]