Previous Message: Re: A couple more things
Next Message: Flying mounts
Month Index: January, 1995
From: Michael Sandy <mehawk@?????.?????.com> Date: Mon, 2 Jan 95 13:01 PST Subject: Re: A couple more things
I think a spaceport equiped with a permanent Reverse Gravity zone would be an excellent thing for a port which trades with ships that aren't designed to land. This is especially useful for planets with such a high gravity that normal helms aren't powerful enough to fight. They are designed for interplanetary travel but it is a great strain on the helm to land and take off frequently. Cargos go up with a mage with a Flight spell to keep it from drifting off the Reverse Gravity and to help the rendevous. Cargos descend by way of very powerful Feather fall spells and a paraglider shape. It would be a little tricky keeping a cargo shuttle centered on the Reverse Gravity shaft, but the thing has no height limit. I suppose you could have little indicators on the wings to indicate which way the local gravity is. Of course, such indicator would have to be isolated from the wind. Perhaps wires could cause an automatic trim adjustment if the shuttle started to stray. Having the drive separate from the ship saves enormously on the costs of accidents, a lost cargo shuttle is cheap compared to the loss of helm and helmsman. Further, such a device is quite useful in defense. Launch a whole bunch of bombardier gliders that climb to 2000', glide over enemy lines, drop bombs, and glide with a much improved glide ratio back to port. Groundling empires, with their large material, but not necessarily magical resources would love such a system. It would also be useful for defending space colonies which can't afford to tie up a Spelljammer for aerial defense and patrols, not to mention allowing very large space forts to be contructed relatively cheaply. Now, putting a Reverse Gravity beam on a ship is more complicated. If the ship rotates, so does the 'reverse gravity of unlimited height field'. how does this field interact with other ships? Do its decks suddenly repel instead of attract? Michael Sandy
Previous Message: Re: A couple more things
Next Message: Flying mounts
Month Index: January, 1995
| Subject | From | Date (UTC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A couple more things | Robert_Myers@???.??.?????.edu | |||
| Re: A couple more things | Jeremy | |||
| Re: A couple more things | Michael Sandy | |||
| Re: A couple more things | Skreyn@???.com | |||
| Re: A couple more things | Joseph Delisle |